Politics of Muscle :: essays research papers

â€Å"The Politics of Muscle† by Gloria Steinem is an exposition contending the distinction in quality among people. Steinem begins her exposition by expressing how she experienced childhood in an age where ladies didn’t take an interest in a ton, assuming any, sport exercises. She proceeds to state that she accepts this is the motivation behind why ladies of her age accept that it’s not what the female body does, yet what it looks like. Steinem feels that ladies consistently appeared to be possessed in some degree as the methods for propagation. She accepts that ladies are caused to feel embarrassed about their quality and that â€Å"only when ladies oppose man centric principles does female muscle become more accepted.† (pg 372)      I believe that Steinem’s target group is essentially for all ladies. I feel she composed this since she feels unequivocally about how the intensity of ladies is seen versus the intensity of how men are seen. I think her basic role is to address ladies and to get them to acknowledge the amount of an effect expanding our physical quality could have on our regular day to day existences. Steinem needs to leave it alone realized that ladies are not objects and that having muscles and quality can in truth be ladylike.      I concur with the creator that society sees ladies as the more vulnerable sex. I likewise accept that the facts demonstrate that a portion of the more athletic lady today are not generally seen as being as lovely as the thin models in the magazines. Be that as it may, I don’t concur with her musings in regards to ladies being assets and how she thinks women’s bodies are images of men’s status. That could in all likelihood be valid in different societies, as she states in her article that there are numerous social contrasts. In any case, for myself, experiencing childhood in the condition that I did, that isn't something that I had ever truly found out about or was observer to.